Review



mhc type i  (Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank)


Bioz Verified Symbol Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 99

    Structured Review

    Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank mhc type i
    Mhc Type I, supplied by Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 5324 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/mhc type i/product/Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank
    Average 99 stars, based on 5324 article reviews
    mhc type i - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    99/100 stars

    Images



    Similar Products

    99
    Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank mhc type i
    Mhc Type I, supplied by Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/mhc type i/product/Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    mhc type i - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    99/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    99
    ATCC cell lines 3t3 l1 atcc cl 173 b16 f10 atcc crl 6475 b16 f10 mhc
    Cell Lines 3t3 L1 Atcc Cl 173 B16 F10 Atcc Crl 6475 B16 F10 Mhc, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/cell lines 3t3 l1 atcc cl 173 b16 f10 atcc crl 6475 b16 f10 mhc/product/ATCC
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    cell lines 3t3 l1 atcc cl 173 b16 f10 atcc crl 6475 b16 f10 mhc - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    99/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    95
    Miltenyi Biotec mhc class i
    Characterization of the T RM population in DLBCL by spectral flow cytometry. A, Representative flow plots of CD103 + CD69 + T cells, highlighted in red. B, % CD103 + CD69 + of T cells per COO ( n = 2–4). C, UMAP reduction of T cells collected from patients with DLBCL ( n = 8) and rLN ( n = 2). Colors represent clusters determined by PhenoGraph clustering ( k = 45). D, Overlay of COO classification of DLBCL samples ( n = 2 for each). E, Overlay of markers of interest is highlighted in red. F, Heatmap showing the percent positivity of all T-cell phenotype markers in spectral panel. G, Boxplots showing the percent of CD103 + (red) or CD103 − (gray) T cells (CD45 + CD3 + CD5 + CD2 + cells) expressing each marker for samples from patients with DLBCL ( n = 10). P values displayed on plot were calculated using paired t tests for each marker. H, Intracellular IFNγ and TNFα expression by CD103 + or CD103 − T cells measured by flow cytometry after bulk single-cell lymphoma biopsy samples ( n = 3) or healthy donor peripheral blood mononuclear cells ( n = 1) were cultured alone, with PMA/ionomycin, or with HLA <t>class</t> <t>I</t> and class II CEF peptide pools for 24 hours. I, Enumeration of remaining live B cells by flow cytometry after 24-hour coculture of sorted CD103 + or CD103 − T cells (sorted as CD8 + or CD4 + cells) with autologous sorted B cells from single-cell biopsy samples of patients with lymphoma ( n = 4). Samples containing CD103 + and CD103 − cells from the same donor are connected with a line. P value generated using a ratio paired t test. The bar graph represents the mean, with error bars representing SEM. For box plots, the center line represents the median, the box represents the IQR, and the whiskers represent 1.5× the IQR. ICS, intracellular staining; UNCLASS, unclassified.
    Mhc Class I, supplied by Miltenyi Biotec, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/mhc class i/product/Miltenyi Biotec
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    mhc class i - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    95/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    Miltenyi Biotec influenza virus cef peptides
    Characterization of the T RM population in DLBCL by spectral flow cytometry. A, Representative flow plots of CD103 + CD69 + T cells, highlighted in red. B, % CD103 + CD69 + of T cells per COO ( n = 2–4). C, UMAP reduction of T cells collected from patients with DLBCL ( n = 8) and rLN ( n = 2). Colors represent clusters determined by PhenoGraph clustering ( k = 45). D, Overlay of COO classification of DLBCL samples ( n = 2 for each). E, Overlay of markers of interest is highlighted in red. F, Heatmap showing the percent positivity of all T-cell phenotype markers in spectral panel. G, Boxplots showing the percent of CD103 + (red) or CD103 − (gray) T cells (CD45 + CD3 + CD5 + CD2 + cells) expressing each marker for samples from patients with DLBCL ( n = 10). P values displayed on plot were calculated using paired t tests for each marker. H, Intracellular IFNγ and TNFα expression by CD103 + or CD103 − T cells measured by flow cytometry after bulk single-cell lymphoma biopsy samples ( n = 3) or healthy donor peripheral blood mononuclear cells ( n = 1) were cultured alone, with PMA/ionomycin, or with HLA <t>class</t> <t>I</t> and class II CEF peptide pools for 24 hours. I, Enumeration of remaining live B cells by flow cytometry after 24-hour coculture of sorted CD103 + or CD103 − T cells (sorted as CD8 + or CD4 + cells) with autologous sorted B cells from single-cell biopsy samples of patients with lymphoma ( n = 4). Samples containing CD103 + and CD103 − cells from the same donor are connected with a line. P value generated using a ratio paired t test. The bar graph represents the mean, with error bars representing SEM. For box plots, the center line represents the median, the box represents the IQR, and the whiskers represent 1.5× the IQR. ICS, intracellular staining; UNCLASS, unclassified.
    Influenza Virus Cef Peptides, supplied by Miltenyi Biotec, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/influenza virus cef peptides/product/Miltenyi Biotec
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    influenza virus cef peptides - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    InvivoGen ova 257 264 h 2kb restricted ova mhc class i epitope
    (A) (Left) Scheme outlining the experimental setup for bulk RNA-seq analyses of tumor-derived CCR7 + DCs. (Right) GO pathway enrichment analyses performed on differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in CCR7 + DCs in MC38 tumors ( n = 4) from Treg-depleted ( FoxP3 -DTR) compared with Treg-sufficient (WT) mice. Bar plot indicates the −log 10 raw binomial p -values of the top 10 most enriched pathways in CCR7 + DCs. (B) (Left) Experimental setup for ex vivo stimulation of OT-I CD8 + T cells with tumor CCR7 + DCs. (Right) Percentage of OT-I CD8 + T cells that proliferated after 5-day culture with OVA <t>257–264</t> peptides-loaded CCR7 + DCs isolated from WT or Treg-depleted tumors. As a control, CCR7 + DCs without OVA 257–264 peptides were used. Two-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons, whiskers represent min to max; ** p < 0.01. (C) (Left) Relative gene expression levels analyzed by bulk RNA-seq. Each dot represents one mouse ( n = 4), whiskers represent mean to max. Unpaired t test with multiple comparisons; * p < 0.05. (Right) Representative histogram of CD40 protein expression and relative mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) measured by FACS and expressed both as normalized values and absolute MFI. Each dot represents one mouse ( n = 18), whiskers represent min to max. Unpaired t test; ** p < 0.01. (D) Analyses of cDCs in tumor-draining lymph nodes. Absolute cell counts (left, n = 10) and MFI of CD40 expression (right, n = 18) measured by FACS in migratory cDCs (CCR7 + CD8α − ) from WT or Treg-depleted mice. Whiskers represent mean to max. (E) (Left) Experimental setup for ex vivo analyses of tumor CCR7 + DCs isolated from anti-PD-1-treated mice that received or not αCD25 NIB mAbs. (Right) CD40 protein expression measured by FACS and expressed both as normalized values and absolute MFI. Each dot represents one mouse ( n = 4 WT and n = 6 FoxP3-DTR), whiskers represent min to max. Unpaired t test; ** p < 0.01. (F) (Left) Overall survival analyses of MC38 tumor-bearing mice treated, or not treated, with αPD-1 and αCD25 NIB mAbs, and in which CD4 + or CD8 + cells were depleted or not ( n = 8 or 9 mice/group). Log-rank Mantel-Cox test; * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001, and *** p < 0.0001. (Right) Percentage of tumor-free mice on day 60 in the indicated treatment groups. (G) (Left) Experimental setup for ex vivo stimulation of OT-I CD8 + T cells with tumor CCR7 + DCs as in (B). The DCs were obtained from mice receiving anti-PD-1 immunotherapy and that were treated or not with αCD25 NIB mAbs. (Right) Percentage of OT-I CD8 + T cells that proliferated after 5-day culture with OVA 257–264 peptide-loaded CCR7 + DCs. Each dot represents one mouse ( n = 8 and n = 7), whiskers represent min to max. Two-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons; * p < 0.05. (H) (Left) Scheme outlining bone marrow chimeras with inducible Cd40 -deficiency in cDCs and the treatment schedule. (Right) Growth curves of MC38 tumors inoculated in zDC iDTR : Cd40 WT and zDC iDTR : Cd40 KO bone marrow chimeras treated with αPD-1, αCD25 NIB , or αPD-1 + αCD25NIB combination ( n = 8–10 mice/group). Mean with SEM. Two-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons; * p < 0.05 and **** p < 0.0001. See also and .
    Ova 257 264 H 2kb Restricted Ova Mhc Class I Epitope, supplied by InvivoGen, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/ova 257 264 h 2kb restricted ova mhc class i epitope/product/InvivoGen
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    ova 257 264 h 2kb restricted ova mhc class i epitope - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    95
    Proteintech mhc i
    (A) (Left) Scheme outlining the experimental setup for bulk RNA-seq analyses of tumor-derived CCR7 + DCs. (Right) GO pathway enrichment analyses performed on differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in CCR7 + DCs in MC38 tumors ( n = 4) from Treg-depleted ( FoxP3 -DTR) compared with Treg-sufficient (WT) mice. Bar plot indicates the −log 10 raw binomial p -values of the top 10 most enriched pathways in CCR7 + DCs. (B) (Left) Experimental setup for ex vivo stimulation of OT-I CD8 + T cells with tumor CCR7 + DCs. (Right) Percentage of OT-I CD8 + T cells that proliferated after 5-day culture with OVA <t>257–264</t> peptides-loaded CCR7 + DCs isolated from WT or Treg-depleted tumors. As a control, CCR7 + DCs without OVA 257–264 peptides were used. Two-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons, whiskers represent min to max; ** p < 0.01. (C) (Left) Relative gene expression levels analyzed by bulk RNA-seq. Each dot represents one mouse ( n = 4), whiskers represent mean to max. Unpaired t test with multiple comparisons; * p < 0.05. (Right) Representative histogram of CD40 protein expression and relative mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) measured by FACS and expressed both as normalized values and absolute MFI. Each dot represents one mouse ( n = 18), whiskers represent min to max. Unpaired t test; ** p < 0.01. (D) Analyses of cDCs in tumor-draining lymph nodes. Absolute cell counts (left, n = 10) and MFI of CD40 expression (right, n = 18) measured by FACS in migratory cDCs (CCR7 + CD8α − ) from WT or Treg-depleted mice. Whiskers represent mean to max. (E) (Left) Experimental setup for ex vivo analyses of tumor CCR7 + DCs isolated from anti-PD-1-treated mice that received or not αCD25 NIB mAbs. (Right) CD40 protein expression measured by FACS and expressed both as normalized values and absolute MFI. Each dot represents one mouse ( n = 4 WT and n = 6 FoxP3-DTR), whiskers represent min to max. Unpaired t test; ** p < 0.01. (F) (Left) Overall survival analyses of MC38 tumor-bearing mice treated, or not treated, with αPD-1 and αCD25 NIB mAbs, and in which CD4 + or CD8 + cells were depleted or not ( n = 8 or 9 mice/group). Log-rank Mantel-Cox test; * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001, and *** p < 0.0001. (Right) Percentage of tumor-free mice on day 60 in the indicated treatment groups. (G) (Left) Experimental setup for ex vivo stimulation of OT-I CD8 + T cells with tumor CCR7 + DCs as in (B). The DCs were obtained from mice receiving anti-PD-1 immunotherapy and that were treated or not with αCD25 NIB mAbs. (Right) Percentage of OT-I CD8 + T cells that proliferated after 5-day culture with OVA 257–264 peptide-loaded CCR7 + DCs. Each dot represents one mouse ( n = 8 and n = 7), whiskers represent min to max. Two-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons; * p < 0.05. (H) (Left) Scheme outlining bone marrow chimeras with inducible Cd40 -deficiency in cDCs and the treatment schedule. (Right) Growth curves of MC38 tumors inoculated in zDC iDTR : Cd40 WT and zDC iDTR : Cd40 KO bone marrow chimeras treated with αPD-1, αCD25 NIB , or αPD-1 + αCD25NIB combination ( n = 8–10 mice/group). Mean with SEM. Two-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons; * p < 0.05 and **** p < 0.0001. See also and .
    Mhc I, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/mhc i/product/Proteintech
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    mhc i - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    95/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    99
    Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank mhc i
    (A) (Left) Scheme outlining the experimental setup for bulk RNA-seq analyses of tumor-derived CCR7 + DCs. (Right) GO pathway enrichment analyses performed on differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in CCR7 + DCs in MC38 tumors ( n = 4) from Treg-depleted ( FoxP3 -DTR) compared with Treg-sufficient (WT) mice. Bar plot indicates the −log 10 raw binomial p -values of the top 10 most enriched pathways in CCR7 + DCs. (B) (Left) Experimental setup for ex vivo stimulation of OT-I CD8 + T cells with tumor CCR7 + DCs. (Right) Percentage of OT-I CD8 + T cells that proliferated after 5-day culture with OVA <t>257–264</t> peptides-loaded CCR7 + DCs isolated from WT or Treg-depleted tumors. As a control, CCR7 + DCs without OVA 257–264 peptides were used. Two-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons, whiskers represent min to max; ** p < 0.01. (C) (Left) Relative gene expression levels analyzed by bulk RNA-seq. Each dot represents one mouse ( n = 4), whiskers represent mean to max. Unpaired t test with multiple comparisons; * p < 0.05. (Right) Representative histogram of CD40 protein expression and relative mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) measured by FACS and expressed both as normalized values and absolute MFI. Each dot represents one mouse ( n = 18), whiskers represent min to max. Unpaired t test; ** p < 0.01. (D) Analyses of cDCs in tumor-draining lymph nodes. Absolute cell counts (left, n = 10) and MFI of CD40 expression (right, n = 18) measured by FACS in migratory cDCs (CCR7 + CD8α − ) from WT or Treg-depleted mice. Whiskers represent mean to max. (E) (Left) Experimental setup for ex vivo analyses of tumor CCR7 + DCs isolated from anti-PD-1-treated mice that received or not αCD25 NIB mAbs. (Right) CD40 protein expression measured by FACS and expressed both as normalized values and absolute MFI. Each dot represents one mouse ( n = 4 WT and n = 6 FoxP3-DTR), whiskers represent min to max. Unpaired t test; ** p < 0.01. (F) (Left) Overall survival analyses of MC38 tumor-bearing mice treated, or not treated, with αPD-1 and αCD25 NIB mAbs, and in which CD4 + or CD8 + cells were depleted or not ( n = 8 or 9 mice/group). Log-rank Mantel-Cox test; * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001, and *** p < 0.0001. (Right) Percentage of tumor-free mice on day 60 in the indicated treatment groups. (G) (Left) Experimental setup for ex vivo stimulation of OT-I CD8 + T cells with tumor CCR7 + DCs as in (B). The DCs were obtained from mice receiving anti-PD-1 immunotherapy and that were treated or not with αCD25 NIB mAbs. (Right) Percentage of OT-I CD8 + T cells that proliferated after 5-day culture with OVA 257–264 peptide-loaded CCR7 + DCs. Each dot represents one mouse ( n = 8 and n = 7), whiskers represent min to max. Two-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons; * p < 0.05. (H) (Left) Scheme outlining bone marrow chimeras with inducible Cd40 -deficiency in cDCs and the treatment schedule. (Right) Growth curves of MC38 tumors inoculated in zDC iDTR : Cd40 WT and zDC iDTR : Cd40 KO bone marrow chimeras treated with αPD-1, αCD25 NIB , or αPD-1 + αCD25NIB combination ( n = 8–10 mice/group). Mean with SEM. Two-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons; * p < 0.05 and **** p < 0.0001. See also and .
    Mhc I, supplied by Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/mhc i/product/Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    mhc i - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    99/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    ATCC anti mhc i antibodies m28 hb27 28 14 8s
    (A) (Left) Scheme outlining the experimental setup for bulk RNA-seq analyses of tumor-derived CCR7 + DCs. (Right) GO pathway enrichment analyses performed on differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in CCR7 + DCs in MC38 tumors ( n = 4) from Treg-depleted ( FoxP3 -DTR) compared with Treg-sufficient (WT) mice. Bar plot indicates the −log 10 raw binomial p -values of the top 10 most enriched pathways in CCR7 + DCs. (B) (Left) Experimental setup for ex vivo stimulation of OT-I CD8 + T cells with tumor CCR7 + DCs. (Right) Percentage of OT-I CD8 + T cells that proliferated after 5-day culture with OVA <t>257–264</t> peptides-loaded CCR7 + DCs isolated from WT or Treg-depleted tumors. As a control, CCR7 + DCs without OVA 257–264 peptides were used. Two-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons, whiskers represent min to max; ** p < 0.01. (C) (Left) Relative gene expression levels analyzed by bulk RNA-seq. Each dot represents one mouse ( n = 4), whiskers represent mean to max. Unpaired t test with multiple comparisons; * p < 0.05. (Right) Representative histogram of CD40 protein expression and relative mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) measured by FACS and expressed both as normalized values and absolute MFI. Each dot represents one mouse ( n = 18), whiskers represent min to max. Unpaired t test; ** p < 0.01. (D) Analyses of cDCs in tumor-draining lymph nodes. Absolute cell counts (left, n = 10) and MFI of CD40 expression (right, n = 18) measured by FACS in migratory cDCs (CCR7 + CD8α − ) from WT or Treg-depleted mice. Whiskers represent mean to max. (E) (Left) Experimental setup for ex vivo analyses of tumor CCR7 + DCs isolated from anti-PD-1-treated mice that received or not αCD25 NIB mAbs. (Right) CD40 protein expression measured by FACS and expressed both as normalized values and absolute MFI. Each dot represents one mouse ( n = 4 WT and n = 6 FoxP3-DTR), whiskers represent min to max. Unpaired t test; ** p < 0.01. (F) (Left) Overall survival analyses of MC38 tumor-bearing mice treated, or not treated, with αPD-1 and αCD25 NIB mAbs, and in which CD4 + or CD8 + cells were depleted or not ( n = 8 or 9 mice/group). Log-rank Mantel-Cox test; * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001, and *** p < 0.0001. (Right) Percentage of tumor-free mice on day 60 in the indicated treatment groups. (G) (Left) Experimental setup for ex vivo stimulation of OT-I CD8 + T cells with tumor CCR7 + DCs as in (B). The DCs were obtained from mice receiving anti-PD-1 immunotherapy and that were treated or not with αCD25 NIB mAbs. (Right) Percentage of OT-I CD8 + T cells that proliferated after 5-day culture with OVA 257–264 peptide-loaded CCR7 + DCs. Each dot represents one mouse ( n = 8 and n = 7), whiskers represent min to max. Two-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons; * p < 0.05. (H) (Left) Scheme outlining bone marrow chimeras with inducible Cd40 -deficiency in cDCs and the treatment schedule. (Right) Growth curves of MC38 tumors inoculated in zDC iDTR : Cd40 WT and zDC iDTR : Cd40 KO bone marrow chimeras treated with αPD-1, αCD25 NIB , or αPD-1 + αCD25NIB combination ( n = 8–10 mice/group). Mean with SEM. Two-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons; * p < 0.05 and **** p < 0.0001. See also and .
    Anti Mhc I Antibodies M28 Hb27 28 14 8s, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/anti mhc i antibodies m28 hb27 28 14 8s/product/ATCC
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti mhc i antibodies m28 hb27 28 14 8s - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    99
    Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank mouse anti mhc i
    (A) (Left) Scheme outlining the experimental setup for bulk RNA-seq analyses of tumor-derived CCR7 + DCs. (Right) GO pathway enrichment analyses performed on differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in CCR7 + DCs in MC38 tumors ( n = 4) from Treg-depleted ( FoxP3 -DTR) compared with Treg-sufficient (WT) mice. Bar plot indicates the −log 10 raw binomial p -values of the top 10 most enriched pathways in CCR7 + DCs. (B) (Left) Experimental setup for ex vivo stimulation of OT-I CD8 + T cells with tumor CCR7 + DCs. (Right) Percentage of OT-I CD8 + T cells that proliferated after 5-day culture with OVA <t>257–264</t> peptides-loaded CCR7 + DCs isolated from WT or Treg-depleted tumors. As a control, CCR7 + DCs without OVA 257–264 peptides were used. Two-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons, whiskers represent min to max; ** p < 0.01. (C) (Left) Relative gene expression levels analyzed by bulk RNA-seq. Each dot represents one mouse ( n = 4), whiskers represent mean to max. Unpaired t test with multiple comparisons; * p < 0.05. (Right) Representative histogram of CD40 protein expression and relative mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) measured by FACS and expressed both as normalized values and absolute MFI. Each dot represents one mouse ( n = 18), whiskers represent min to max. Unpaired t test; ** p < 0.01. (D) Analyses of cDCs in tumor-draining lymph nodes. Absolute cell counts (left, n = 10) and MFI of CD40 expression (right, n = 18) measured by FACS in migratory cDCs (CCR7 + CD8α − ) from WT or Treg-depleted mice. Whiskers represent mean to max. (E) (Left) Experimental setup for ex vivo analyses of tumor CCR7 + DCs isolated from anti-PD-1-treated mice that received or not αCD25 NIB mAbs. (Right) CD40 protein expression measured by FACS and expressed both as normalized values and absolute MFI. Each dot represents one mouse ( n = 4 WT and n = 6 FoxP3-DTR), whiskers represent min to max. Unpaired t test; ** p < 0.01. (F) (Left) Overall survival analyses of MC38 tumor-bearing mice treated, or not treated, with αPD-1 and αCD25 NIB mAbs, and in which CD4 + or CD8 + cells were depleted or not ( n = 8 or 9 mice/group). Log-rank Mantel-Cox test; * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001, and *** p < 0.0001. (Right) Percentage of tumor-free mice on day 60 in the indicated treatment groups. (G) (Left) Experimental setup for ex vivo stimulation of OT-I CD8 + T cells with tumor CCR7 + DCs as in (B). The DCs were obtained from mice receiving anti-PD-1 immunotherapy and that were treated or not with αCD25 NIB mAbs. (Right) Percentage of OT-I CD8 + T cells that proliferated after 5-day culture with OVA 257–264 peptide-loaded CCR7 + DCs. Each dot represents one mouse ( n = 8 and n = 7), whiskers represent min to max. Two-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons; * p < 0.05. (H) (Left) Scheme outlining bone marrow chimeras with inducible Cd40 -deficiency in cDCs and the treatment schedule. (Right) Growth curves of MC38 tumors inoculated in zDC iDTR : Cd40 WT and zDC iDTR : Cd40 KO bone marrow chimeras treated with αPD-1, αCD25 NIB , or αPD-1 + αCD25NIB combination ( n = 8–10 mice/group). Mean with SEM. Two-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons; * p < 0.05 and **** p < 0.0001. See also and .
    Mouse Anti Mhc I, supplied by Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse anti mhc i/product/Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    mouse anti mhc i - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    99/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Characterization of the T RM population in DLBCL by spectral flow cytometry. A, Representative flow plots of CD103 + CD69 + T cells, highlighted in red. B, % CD103 + CD69 + of T cells per COO ( n = 2–4). C, UMAP reduction of T cells collected from patients with DLBCL ( n = 8) and rLN ( n = 2). Colors represent clusters determined by PhenoGraph clustering ( k = 45). D, Overlay of COO classification of DLBCL samples ( n = 2 for each). E, Overlay of markers of interest is highlighted in red. F, Heatmap showing the percent positivity of all T-cell phenotype markers in spectral panel. G, Boxplots showing the percent of CD103 + (red) or CD103 − (gray) T cells (CD45 + CD3 + CD5 + CD2 + cells) expressing each marker for samples from patients with DLBCL ( n = 10). P values displayed on plot were calculated using paired t tests for each marker. H, Intracellular IFNγ and TNFα expression by CD103 + or CD103 − T cells measured by flow cytometry after bulk single-cell lymphoma biopsy samples ( n = 3) or healthy donor peripheral blood mononuclear cells ( n = 1) were cultured alone, with PMA/ionomycin, or with HLA class I and class II CEF peptide pools for 24 hours. I, Enumeration of remaining live B cells by flow cytometry after 24-hour coculture of sorted CD103 + or CD103 − T cells (sorted as CD8 + or CD4 + cells) with autologous sorted B cells from single-cell biopsy samples of patients with lymphoma ( n = 4). Samples containing CD103 + and CD103 − cells from the same donor are connected with a line. P value generated using a ratio paired t test. The bar graph represents the mean, with error bars representing SEM. For box plots, the center line represents the median, the box represents the IQR, and the whiskers represent 1.5× the IQR. ICS, intracellular staining; UNCLASS, unclassified.

    Journal: Cancer Immunology Research

    Article Title: Phenotypic Characterization and Prognostic Impact of CD103 + Tissue-Resident Memory T Cells in Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma

    doi: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-25-0445

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Characterization of the T RM population in DLBCL by spectral flow cytometry. A, Representative flow plots of CD103 + CD69 + T cells, highlighted in red. B, % CD103 + CD69 + of T cells per COO ( n = 2–4). C, UMAP reduction of T cells collected from patients with DLBCL ( n = 8) and rLN ( n = 2). Colors represent clusters determined by PhenoGraph clustering ( k = 45). D, Overlay of COO classification of DLBCL samples ( n = 2 for each). E, Overlay of markers of interest is highlighted in red. F, Heatmap showing the percent positivity of all T-cell phenotype markers in spectral panel. G, Boxplots showing the percent of CD103 + (red) or CD103 − (gray) T cells (CD45 + CD3 + CD5 + CD2 + cells) expressing each marker for samples from patients with DLBCL ( n = 10). P values displayed on plot were calculated using paired t tests for each marker. H, Intracellular IFNγ and TNFα expression by CD103 + or CD103 − T cells measured by flow cytometry after bulk single-cell lymphoma biopsy samples ( n = 3) or healthy donor peripheral blood mononuclear cells ( n = 1) were cultured alone, with PMA/ionomycin, or with HLA class I and class II CEF peptide pools for 24 hours. I, Enumeration of remaining live B cells by flow cytometry after 24-hour coculture of sorted CD103 + or CD103 − T cells (sorted as CD8 + or CD4 + cells) with autologous sorted B cells from single-cell biopsy samples of patients with lymphoma ( n = 4). Samples containing CD103 + and CD103 − cells from the same donor are connected with a line. P value generated using a ratio paired t test. The bar graph represents the mean, with error bars representing SEM. For box plots, the center line represents the median, the box represents the IQR, and the whiskers represent 1.5× the IQR. ICS, intracellular staining; UNCLASS, unclassified.

    Article Snippet: Bulk-cell suspensions (1 × 10 6 ) were cultured alone, with MHC class I and class II cytomegalovirus, Epstein–Barr virus, and influenza virus (CEF) peptides (Miltenyi Biotech, cat. #130-098-426 and Cedarlane, cat. #PT-PA-CEFT-001-1), or with 1× cell activation cocktail [phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) and ionomycin; BioLegend, cat. #423301] for 24 hours in RPMI-1640 supplemented with 1% (vol/vol) GlutaMAX (Gibco, cat. #35050061), 1% (vol/vol) penicillin–streptomycin (Thermo Fisher Scientific, cat. #15140122), 50 μmol/L β-mercaptoethanol (Sigma-Aldrich, cat. #M3148), 5% (vol/vol) male AB-plasma human serum (Sigma-Aldrich, cat. #H4522), and 5 U/mL IL2 (PeproTech, cat. #200-02) in 96-well flat-bottom plates.

    Techniques: Flow Cytometry, Expressing, Marker, Cell Culture, Generated, Staining

    (A) (Left) Scheme outlining the experimental setup for bulk RNA-seq analyses of tumor-derived CCR7 + DCs. (Right) GO pathway enrichment analyses performed on differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in CCR7 + DCs in MC38 tumors ( n = 4) from Treg-depleted ( FoxP3 -DTR) compared with Treg-sufficient (WT) mice. Bar plot indicates the −log 10 raw binomial p -values of the top 10 most enriched pathways in CCR7 + DCs. (B) (Left) Experimental setup for ex vivo stimulation of OT-I CD8 + T cells with tumor CCR7 + DCs. (Right) Percentage of OT-I CD8 + T cells that proliferated after 5-day culture with OVA 257–264 peptides-loaded CCR7 + DCs isolated from WT or Treg-depleted tumors. As a control, CCR7 + DCs without OVA 257–264 peptides were used. Two-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons, whiskers represent min to max; ** p < 0.01. (C) (Left) Relative gene expression levels analyzed by bulk RNA-seq. Each dot represents one mouse ( n = 4), whiskers represent mean to max. Unpaired t test with multiple comparisons; * p < 0.05. (Right) Representative histogram of CD40 protein expression and relative mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) measured by FACS and expressed both as normalized values and absolute MFI. Each dot represents one mouse ( n = 18), whiskers represent min to max. Unpaired t test; ** p < 0.01. (D) Analyses of cDCs in tumor-draining lymph nodes. Absolute cell counts (left, n = 10) and MFI of CD40 expression (right, n = 18) measured by FACS in migratory cDCs (CCR7 + CD8α − ) from WT or Treg-depleted mice. Whiskers represent mean to max. (E) (Left) Experimental setup for ex vivo analyses of tumor CCR7 + DCs isolated from anti-PD-1-treated mice that received or not αCD25 NIB mAbs. (Right) CD40 protein expression measured by FACS and expressed both as normalized values and absolute MFI. Each dot represents one mouse ( n = 4 WT and n = 6 FoxP3-DTR), whiskers represent min to max. Unpaired t test; ** p < 0.01. (F) (Left) Overall survival analyses of MC38 tumor-bearing mice treated, or not treated, with αPD-1 and αCD25 NIB mAbs, and in which CD4 + or CD8 + cells were depleted or not ( n = 8 or 9 mice/group). Log-rank Mantel-Cox test; * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001, and *** p < 0.0001. (Right) Percentage of tumor-free mice on day 60 in the indicated treatment groups. (G) (Left) Experimental setup for ex vivo stimulation of OT-I CD8 + T cells with tumor CCR7 + DCs as in (B). The DCs were obtained from mice receiving anti-PD-1 immunotherapy and that were treated or not with αCD25 NIB mAbs. (Right) Percentage of OT-I CD8 + T cells that proliferated after 5-day culture with OVA 257–264 peptide-loaded CCR7 + DCs. Each dot represents one mouse ( n = 8 and n = 7), whiskers represent min to max. Two-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons; * p < 0.05. (H) (Left) Scheme outlining bone marrow chimeras with inducible Cd40 -deficiency in cDCs and the treatment schedule. (Right) Growth curves of MC38 tumors inoculated in zDC iDTR : Cd40 WT and zDC iDTR : Cd40 KO bone marrow chimeras treated with αPD-1, αCD25 NIB , or αPD-1 + αCD25NIB combination ( n = 8–10 mice/group). Mean with SEM. Two-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons; * p < 0.05 and **** p < 0.0001. See also and .

    Journal: Immunity

    Article Title: Positioning and reversible suppression of CCR7 + dendritic cells in perivascular tumor niches shape cancer immunity

    doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2025.11.020

    Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) (Left) Scheme outlining the experimental setup for bulk RNA-seq analyses of tumor-derived CCR7 + DCs. (Right) GO pathway enrichment analyses performed on differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in CCR7 + DCs in MC38 tumors ( n = 4) from Treg-depleted ( FoxP3 -DTR) compared with Treg-sufficient (WT) mice. Bar plot indicates the −log 10 raw binomial p -values of the top 10 most enriched pathways in CCR7 + DCs. (B) (Left) Experimental setup for ex vivo stimulation of OT-I CD8 + T cells with tumor CCR7 + DCs. (Right) Percentage of OT-I CD8 + T cells that proliferated after 5-day culture with OVA 257–264 peptides-loaded CCR7 + DCs isolated from WT or Treg-depleted tumors. As a control, CCR7 + DCs without OVA 257–264 peptides were used. Two-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons, whiskers represent min to max; ** p < 0.01. (C) (Left) Relative gene expression levels analyzed by bulk RNA-seq. Each dot represents one mouse ( n = 4), whiskers represent mean to max. Unpaired t test with multiple comparisons; * p < 0.05. (Right) Representative histogram of CD40 protein expression and relative mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) measured by FACS and expressed both as normalized values and absolute MFI. Each dot represents one mouse ( n = 18), whiskers represent min to max. Unpaired t test; ** p < 0.01. (D) Analyses of cDCs in tumor-draining lymph nodes. Absolute cell counts (left, n = 10) and MFI of CD40 expression (right, n = 18) measured by FACS in migratory cDCs (CCR7 + CD8α − ) from WT or Treg-depleted mice. Whiskers represent mean to max. (E) (Left) Experimental setup for ex vivo analyses of tumor CCR7 + DCs isolated from anti-PD-1-treated mice that received or not αCD25 NIB mAbs. (Right) CD40 protein expression measured by FACS and expressed both as normalized values and absolute MFI. Each dot represents one mouse ( n = 4 WT and n = 6 FoxP3-DTR), whiskers represent min to max. Unpaired t test; ** p < 0.01. (F) (Left) Overall survival analyses of MC38 tumor-bearing mice treated, or not treated, with αPD-1 and αCD25 NIB mAbs, and in which CD4 + or CD8 + cells were depleted or not ( n = 8 or 9 mice/group). Log-rank Mantel-Cox test; * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001, and *** p < 0.0001. (Right) Percentage of tumor-free mice on day 60 in the indicated treatment groups. (G) (Left) Experimental setup for ex vivo stimulation of OT-I CD8 + T cells with tumor CCR7 + DCs as in (B). The DCs were obtained from mice receiving anti-PD-1 immunotherapy and that were treated or not with αCD25 NIB mAbs. (Right) Percentage of OT-I CD8 + T cells that proliferated after 5-day culture with OVA 257–264 peptide-loaded CCR7 + DCs. Each dot represents one mouse ( n = 8 and n = 7), whiskers represent min to max. Two-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons; * p < 0.05. (H) (Left) Scheme outlining bone marrow chimeras with inducible Cd40 -deficiency in cDCs and the treatment schedule. (Right) Growth curves of MC38 tumors inoculated in zDC iDTR : Cd40 WT and zDC iDTR : Cd40 KO bone marrow chimeras treated with αPD-1, αCD25 NIB , or αPD-1 + αCD25NIB combination ( n = 8–10 mice/group). Mean with SEM. Two-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons; * p < 0.05 and **** p < 0.0001. See also and .

    Article Snippet: OVA 257-264 H-2Kb-restricted OVA MHC class I epitope , InvivoGen , Cat#vac-sin.

    Techniques: RNA Sequencing, Derivative Assay, Ex Vivo, Isolation, Control, Gene Expression, Expressing, Fluorescence